
Sea Shepherd is a Conservation Society that was established in 1977 by environmental conservationist Paul Watson. Watson, despite having co-founded Greenpeace, was voted out of the organization for his aggressive actions taken in his conservation efforts. Soon after being kicked out, Watson decided to take things into his own hands, and in an attempt to follow what he so strongly stood for, founded Sea Shepherd.
Sea Shepherd is unlike other conservation organizations; the people of Sea Shepherd believe that the most effective way to put an end to unlawful acts towards wildlife is through direct action. It is no surprise that many disagree with Sea Shepherd and find it difficult to side with the organization.
The television series
Whale Wars, which aired for the first time on Animal Planet last year, follows the Steve Irwin, a Sea Shepherd vessel, across the icy Antarctic waters in search of Japanese whaling fleets. The crew harasses the Japanese by throwing butyric acid stink bombs and slippery chemicals aboard the ships, clogging engines, and even by climbing aboard the ships for direct confrontation.
Paul Watson, an environmental 'pirate' of our time, will do anything to win his battles, and him and his crew are all willing to put their lives on the line to save wildlife.
So, here's what I think -
For what they do, Sea Shepherd is an heroic organization; I strongly agree with their belief that these days, in order for something to be done towards wildlife conservation, direct and aggressive action is absolutely necessary. I agree with Paul Watson's argument that Greenpeace is ineffective; while their efforts are heartfelt and good intentioned, simply holding up anti-whaling signs and taking photographs, for example, will only get so far.
However, I disagree with a major aspect of Watson's initiative - putting peoples lives on the line

to make a point. Hear me out:
The people of Sea Shepherd in the show
Whale Wars make it clear that they are willing to die for the whales. I don't have an issue with this, because to be quite honest, I am begining to believe that I myself would do the same.
However, when people personally declare such a strong decision, lines need to be drawn...
To say that you are willing to die to save a species - to me - has multiple meanings.
To be
willing to put yourself in danger through conservation efforts is one thing; to
have to sacrifice yourself entirely to
prove a point is another.
The crew of the Steve Irwin put their lives in danger by being willing to leave home for months to live in the Antarctic Ocean, where the nearest hospital is days of sailing away, battling the Japanese whalers on the icy waters that can kill within minutes.
However, when Paul Watson asks his crew members to climb aboard the Japanese vessels for direct confrontation, he is literally asking them not only to sacrifice their lives but to be willing to essentially face any and all punishments that they may recieve - just to prove a point. With this tactic, Paul doesn't care what happens to his crew - he
wants the Japanese to hold these people hostage and to torture them. This way, the media can see these brutalities and hopefully exile the Japanese fleets from the whaling sanctuaries of Antarctica.
While this is a cunning plan, it is in my opinion unecessary.

Take Gorilla Conservationist Diane Fossey, for instance. Diane devoted her life to protecting Gorillas in Africa from being poached. Diane was brutally murdered in her home in Africa one night.
Diane focused on protecting the Gorillas because it was what she was passionate about. She did not ask to be killed - but it was something she was surely aware may happen. She was killed not because she asked for it, but because that was how it was meant to happen.
To me, wildlife conservation is a beautiful thing; and while it may get out of hand and aggressive, I do not believe that people should have to die for it. Unfortunately, they do, but they shouldn't
have to - in Watson's eyes, they might as well.
I like Sea Shepherd's stink bomb/slippery chemical tactics because they don't directly harm anyone - which is their purpose. How, then, does sacrificing the people of the crew to be directly harmed by the Japanese make any sense? In my opinion, when in comes to wildlife conservation, direct HARM to both animals and humans should be avoided at all costs.
Watson is a risk taker - which is what many admire about him. Sometimes, however, he takes his risks too far. I can say with 100% conviciton that I am equally passionate about saving wildlife as is Paul Watson. Unfortunately, I am only an 18 year old still in college, so there is only so much that I can do at this point. However, Watson and I differ in one major way - he
is a modern day pirate, and he
is willing to put peoples lives on the line in the name of wildlife.
While I may be willing to put my own life on the line, I would never ask others to do the same, and I do not belive that anyone should have to take such drastic measures to prove their point.
Don't get me wrong, Watson does have a point. These days, what is on the minds of a majority of people is not saving wildlife, but money. Whaling is a million dollar industry in Japan.
To be able to make a difference and to change the minds of such powerul and corrupt businesses, major actions need to be taken. Actions, however, that keep people out of direct harms way.

Yes, people and the media respond only when they are exposed to the harsh truths, and what better way to get their attention than by killing our own kind and by bringing war and death into the picture? It is true, and Paul Watson knows this very well - and in order to end whaling, he is willing to put peoples lives on the line.
To be quite honest, I'm not entirely sure if there is a better option. Surely Watson's tactics catch peoples attention - which is what organizations like the Sea Shepherd need... but there must be another way.
There must be a way to end these brutalities, to save the sacred and beautiful wildlife in the oceans and on the lands alike that doesn't require such sacrifices.
Then again, what do I know?
Taking pictures and protesting doesn't work, and stink bombs and harassment will only go so far. As far as I'm concerned, Paul Watson's tactics are revolutionary when it comes to Wildlife Conservation, and in a matter of years I may be following in his very own footsteps. One can't deny that the man has done great things in the name of Conservation, afterall...
For now, I hope to find a way to do what I love, to save the whales and all other wildlife, without having to harm people in the process.
So, in all, I am all for Sea Shepherd. I wouldn't mind joining the crew myself, eventually... so long as Watson decides to come up with new tactics (I won't hold my breath)
If anyone actually reads this, I would love to hear your opinions!
---
Wildlife of the Day:African Crowned CraneInteresting Facts:
-Roost in trees
-Golden 'crown' protruding from back of neck
-Have interesting voices; lack folds in their windpipe
-Survived the Ice Age